uplIft: Jan 13, 2022
Perspective
PROFESSIONAL Conundrum
“To be a big fish in a small pond or a small fish in a big pond”
Being a big fish in a small pond is akin with being more influential/ powerful vs. your small peer group. It offers greater autonomy & responsibility, opportunity to be the in centerfold, but the spectrum of opportunity and therefore growth could be limited.
Small fish in a big pond is akin with having lesser power/importance than your peers in a much larger group. It offers greater growth & learning opportunities, though it is harder to land them by virtue of being a small fish.
There is no silver bullet answer. It is an individualistic choice, which really depends on a careful consideration of the 4 factors.
a. Life Stage –personal responsibilities and professional priorities (importance vs. stability vs. role)
b. Long Term Career Objective – generalist vs. specialist
c. Risk Appetite – default preference for stability
d. Career Stage – beginner, mid-career professional or late stage professional
Our careers are a marathon, and typically to have a holistic experience it is important that we remain fluid to move across being a big fish in a small pond and a small fish in a big pond on different occasions. Most important is to be a part of a growing pond. If the organization you are a part of is stagnating then its better you move to a different pond (smaller or larger doesn’t matter).